I
imagined when the other day I suggested that the West’s proposal to arm the
Syrian rebels is a mistake, my words would be universally welcomed as a useless
statement of the obvious. Well, the same day the EU announced that it would
indeed give assistance to the assorted secularist, Sunnis, Salafists and Al
Q’aeda fighters, the Russians exhibited newsreel of their firing of advanced
SS300 surface-to-air missiles. The next day Russia declared
it would supply these weapons to Assad to deter “hotheads” who might be tempted
to intervene on Assad’s side. These hotheads are the foreign ministers of the
EU.
Grant
that the EU’s apparent willingness to supply weapons which will soon fall into
the hands of local terrorists is potentially catastrophic, is there nothing that
the EU might do which would actually be useful? There is, but they have
repeatedly refused to do it. Why don’t the EU ministers declare the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard to be what it is, a terrorist organisation, and add it to
the their list of proscriptions?
There is proof of the IRG’s meddling in Syria where it
defends what the EU describes as “the brutal and murderous regime of Bashar Al
Assad.” The IRG have been providing fighters, weapons and training to the Assad
regime and to Hezbollah, the Iranian proxy terrorist organisation created by the
IRG in the 1980s. Hezbollah ,“The Party of Allah,” has helped perpetrate many
massacres during the Syrian civil war.
As
distinguish between one terrorist organisation and another, we might as well try
to judge between a louse and a flea. But this is precisely what the EU does as
its policies will greatly assist the Sunni, Salafist and Al Q’aeda terrorists
currently waging was in Syria . By refusing to proscribe the
IRG, EU foreign ministers are lending the strongest support possible to the
dictator Assad whose removal they claim to desire. Thus, their left hand does
not know what their right hand is doing. But then, of course, in the EU both
hands are Left.